Spiers v. Duane
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Wright, J. Action for forcible entry and detainer. The facts are stated in-the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, Ross, J.:
The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment as to all of the defendants except Epstein.
It was shown upon the trial, that the lot in question was inclosed with a board fence, a.nd had a house upon it; that a tenant of plaintiff lived with his family upon the premises from May 25th, 1872, to April 27th, 1876; that on the 26th of April the tenant began to move therefrom, finished moving the next day, locked the doors of the' house, and on the following day (the 28th) surrendered the keys to the plaintiff. The day succeeding this being Saturday, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Burr v. MacLay Rancho Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Ennor v. RaineNevada Supreme Court · 1903
- Hewitt v. Maryland State Board of CensorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Goffin v. McCall and HusbandSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.