Legal Opinion

Cromaglass Corporation, Williamsport, Pa. (A Pennsylvania Corporation) v. Carl Ferm

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 1, 1974No. 72-1815PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

This ease presents the issue of appeal-ability of sanctions imposed by the district judge for failure to comply with discovery orders. The original jurisdiction is stated in the complaint to be as follows: “This Court has jurisdiction of the claim of plaintiff for relief which involves damages in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00); and which arises under the laws of the United States, to wit: Title 35, U.S.Code, Sections 281-287, 289 and 292; and Title 28, Sections 1331, 1338 and 1355.”

Plaintiff-appellant Cromaglass Corporation (Cromaglass)…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Larry Marshak v. Faye Treadwell Treadwell Drifters, Inc the Drifters, Inc. Bowen Agency Ltd/admiral TalentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. DeMasi v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API