Cromaglass Corporation, Williamsport, Pa. (A Pennsylvania Corporation) v. Carl Ferm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
This ease presents the issue of appeal-ability of sanctions imposed by the district judge for failure to comply with discovery orders. The original jurisdiction is stated in the complaint to be as follows: “This Court has jurisdiction of the claim of plaintiff for relief which involves damages in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00); and which arises under the laws of the United States, to wit: Title 35, U.S.Code, Sections 281-287, 289 and 292; and Title 28, Sections 1331, 1338 and 1355.”
Plaintiff-appellant Cromaglass Corporation (Cromaglass)…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Larry Marshak v. Faye Treadwell Treadwell Drifters, Inc the Drifters, Inc. Bowen Agency Ltd/admiral TalentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- DeMasi v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.