Legal Opinion

In re Kamal R.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 3, 2013No. AC 35080PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The respondent father1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental *68rights with respect to his son, Kamal R. On appeal, the sole issue is whether the court properly found that the department of children and families (department), had made reasonable efforts to reunite the respondent with Kamal. We conclude that the court’s finding was proper and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The court’s memorandum of decision reveals the following facts and procedural history. Kamal was bom in December, 2009. In February, 2010, the petitioner, the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. In re Jah'za G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Etta H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API