In re Kamal R.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The respondent father1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental *68rights with respect to his son, Kamal R. On appeal, the sole issue is whether the court properly found that the department of children and families (department), had made reasonable efforts to reunite the respondent with Kamal. We conclude that the court’s finding was proper and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court’s memorandum of decision reveals the following facts and procedural history. Kamal was bom in December, 2009. In February, 2010, the petitioner, the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- In re Jah'za G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In re Etta H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013