Buckley v. City of Falls Church
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARROW, J.
In this criminal appeal we decide that necessity is not a defense to a charge of trespassing on the premises of a women’s medical clinic in order to give anti-abortion literature to patients considering an abortion. The defense of necessity is not available to these defendants since there were reasonable and legal alternatives to their violation of the law.
The defense of necessity traditionally addresses the dilemma created when physical forces beyond the actor’s control renders “illegal conduct the lesser of two evils.” United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 410 (1980). If…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Cleveland v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Clanton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- State v. O'BRIENMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Byers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Humphrey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.