Jackson v. Norman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 4. Error from District Court, Cotton County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action brought by J. C. Norman for money had and received, against J. W. Jackson, A. S. Wells, E. S. Bingham, O. F. Gammill, E. S. Martin, P. J. Hartzler, It.
Read the full summary
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 4. Error from District Court, Cotton County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action brought by J. C. Norman for money had and received, against J. W. Jackson, A. S. Wells, E. S. Bingham, O. F. Gammill, E. S. Martin, P. J. Hartzler, It. L. Wyatt, W. T. Huff, D. L. Davis, R. A. Odam, W. D. Sawyer, E. E. Jackson, and Claude Caddell, Jackson-Queen Oil & Gas Company, a copartnership composed of J. W. Jackson, A. S. Wells, A. G. Bingham, O, F. Gammill, E. S. Martin, P. J. Hartzler, it. L. Wyatt, D. Ij. Davis, R. A. Odam, W. D. Sawyer, E. E. Jackson, W. T. Huff, Claude…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DICKSON, C.
The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendants, as they were designated in the trial court.
The defendants, being owners of an oil and gas lease covering 20 acres of land in Cotton county, Okla., undertook to organize a company to be known as the Jackson-Queen Oil & Gas Company, with a capital stock of $60,000, to be divided into 600 shares of the par value of $100 each, and induced the plaintiff and various other persons to subscribe and pay for shares of stock in said company under a written agreement, which, in •'substance, provides that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Frick v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Miller v. DenmanWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Kentucky Refining Co. v. Purcell Cotton Seed Oil MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alkire v. AcuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928