Legal Opinion

Schuman Bros. v. First Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1925No. 15276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Numerous assignments of error are raised by the petition in error in this case, but the only questions necessary to a decision are the questions of the jurisdiction of the trial court and of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the directed verdict and judgment.

Briefly stated, the facts shown in this case are that on June 4, 1921, defendants executed their note to the plaintiff for the sum of $2,500 due September 4, 1921; that on or about the due date of the note defendants procured an extension of the same to October 4, 1921; that on October 3 1921, an involuntary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Moore v. TrounstineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. In re HawksDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1913
  5. Torry v. KraussSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re KornbluthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Arkansas Baptist State Convention v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Haddock v. First National Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Arkansas Baptist State Convention v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API