Legal Opinion
Gross v. Waywell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 16, 2009No. 08 Civ. 9498PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Herman Gross (“Gross”) and R.A.K. Tennis Corp., (“RAK”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against defendants Roderick Waywell (“Waywell”) and Lisa Waywell (together, the “Way-wells”), Hugo Costa (“Costa”), Barbara Errigo 1 (“Errigo”), and Jeffrey Shapiro 2 (“Shapiro”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, as well as various state law causes of action. The unlawful conduct the complaint describes arises from Defendants’…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Ho Myung Moolsan Co. v. Manitou Mineral Water, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Kalimantano GmbH v. Motion in Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kerrigan v. Visalus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Westchester County Independence Party v. AstorinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.