Arnold v. KJD Real Estate, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The Rooker-Feldmcm doctrine rests on the fact that only the Supreme Court of the United States has appellate jurisdiction over state court decisions (and its authority extends only to federal questions, see 28 U.S.C. § 1257). In this case, a state court ordered Dan Arnold to deliver certain corporate stock to Geissler Roofing and D & D Property Management (collectively, the Corporate) pursuant to an earlier alleged settlement agreement. The state court did not know that Arnold had already sold the stock to a third, KJD Real Estate (KJD). Arnold filed an interpleader action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Cervac v. Littman (In re Littman)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Primerica Life Ins. Co. v. FrantzDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Otrompke v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Layman v. City of PeoriaDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2018
- Andress v. Daubert Law Firm LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.