Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Thurston County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 6, 2010No. 37446-3-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Penoyar, A.C.J.

¶1 David Koenig appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for partial summary judgment and ruling that a victim impact statement and a special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA) evaluation were exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW.1 We affirm that *401victim impact statements are exempt from the PRA under the investigative record exemption, but we reverse the trial court’s determination that SSOSA evaluations are exempt. We hold that SSOSA evaluations must be disclosed after redaction of any identifying information regarding…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Seattle Police DeparmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Sargent v. SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Koenig v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API