Legal Opinion

Sargent v. SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 19, 2011No. 65896-4-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

260 P.3d 1006 (2011)

Evan SARGENT, Respondent/Cross Appellant,

v.

SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant/Cross Respondent.

No. 65896-4-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

September 19, 2011.

Gary T. Smith, Seattle City Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Greg Overstreet, Allied Law Group, Olympia, WA, Patrick Preston, Thomas M. Brennan, McKay Chadwell, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Ramsey E. Ramerman, City of Everett, Everett, WA, for Amicus Curiae Association of Municipal Attorneys.

ELLINGTON, J.

¶ 1 This case is brought under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW. The chief…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Seattle Police Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. O'Neill v. City of ShorelineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Beth And Doug O'neill v. City Of ShorelineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Cedar Grove Composting Incorporated, / X-app. v. City Of Marysville, / X-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API