Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koenig v. Thurston County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2012No. 84940-4Published

1DissentJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶45 (dissenting) — Our legislature has recognized that effective law enforcement and individual privacy rights outweigh the public’s interest in the disclosure of certain information. Accordingly, the Public Records Act (PRA)7 expressly exempts “investigative records,” the disclosure of which would impair these interests. RCW 42.56.240(1). Contrary to the plain language of this statute and our decisional law interpreting its scope, the majority holds two highly sensitive records that were compiled by a prosecutor — a victim impact statement (VIS) and a special sex offender sentencing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API