Legal Opinion
Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided March 27, 1980No. C.D. 4848; Court 77-8-02004PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This is an American manufacturers’ action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1682(b) (1976), 28 U.S.C. § 2632(a) (1976) and 19 U.S.C. § 1516(c) (1976), involving the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. §§ 160, et seq. (1970)) (Antidumping Act).
Plaintiffs, domestic manufacturers and/or wholesalers of certain nonpowered hand tools (viz., chisels, punches, hammers and sledges, vises, c-clamps and battery service tools), contest the negative injury determination of the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) in Investigation No. AA1921-149 (40…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Usinor, Beautor, Haironville, Sollac Atlantique, Sollac Lorraine v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- PS Chez Sidney, LLC v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Connecticut Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.