Legal Opinion
Usinor, Beautor, Haironville, Sollac Atlantique, Sollac Lorraine v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 9, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-65; Court 01-00010PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Usinor, Beautor, Haironville, Sollac Atlantique, Sollac Lorraine, and U.S. importer Usinor Steel Corporation (collectively “French Producers”); 1 Plaintiffs Thyssen Krupp Stahl AG, EKO Stahl GmbH, Stahwerke Bremen GmbH, and Salzgitter (collectively “German Producers”); Defendant-Intervenors 2 Bethlehem Steel Corp., Ispat Inland, Inc., LTV Steel Company, Inc., National Steel Corporation, and U.S. Steel Group, filed comments on the United States International Trade Commission’s (hereafter “Commission” or “ITC”) Remand Determination of September 17,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Jacobi Carbons AB and Jacobi Carbons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- ABB, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.