Legal Opinion
D'AMICO v. Crosson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1999PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs, Judges of the Erie County Court, claim that defendants violated their equal protection rights by causing them to be paid less than their counterpart Judges in the County Courts of Albany, Onondaga, and Sullivan Counties. In October 1993, when plaintiffs filed the instant complaint, Judges of the Albany County Court were payed approximately 4.6% more than their Erie County judicial counterparts— $99,300 to $94,900. The percentage disparity has remained constant, with the annual salaries of Albany County Court Judges, as per newly acquired judicial pay raises,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Maresca v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tolub v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Affronti v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. PaniaguaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Chilberg v. ChilbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Barr v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gomez v. EvangelistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.