Tolub v. Evans
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the various provisions of the Judiciary Law which provide the method of computing salaries for law assistants serving in the Unified Court System violate the petitioners’ right to equal protection of the law.
Petitioners are law assistants to Justices and Judges of the Supreme Court and the Surrogate’s Court in the City of New York. Prior to April 1, 1977, they were paid by the city pursuant to the city’s managerial and executive pay plan. As of April 1,1977, the responsibility for petitioners’ salaries was assumed by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Maresca v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lowell Peterson v. Kenneth E. Lindner, Secretary of the Department of Administration, State of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shattenkirk v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.