Legal Opinion
Maresca v. Cuomo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1984PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
On this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the State constitutional and statutory requirements that certain Judges of the State retire at age 70. The challenge is based upon both the equal protection and due process clauses to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.1
Plaintiffs Maresca, Rosen, Ramos-Lopez and Wollin are Judges of the Civil Court of the City of New York who have reached the age of 70 in 1984, and pursuant to article VI (§ 25, subd b) of the New York State Constitution2 and section 23 of *248the Judiciary Law,3 are compelled to retire on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Nestor v. McDowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- 41 Kew Gardens Road Associates v. TyburskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Krugman v. Board of Assessors of the Village of Atlantic BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Forti v. New York State Ethics CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.