Legal Opinion

Bream v. Benscoter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2003No. 28215PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an action to recover on an alleged guaranty in a promissory note. The district court held that the promissory note was ambiguous on its face regarding whether Ada Benscoter signed as a witness or a guarantor, and, after considering parol evidence, it found that she signed the note as a witness. It therefore entered a judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In April or May 1996, the plaintiff-appellant David Bream loaned Art King $50,000 to purchase and operate a business which became known as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fox v. Mountain West Electric, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Petersen v. Franklin CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. J.R. Simplot Co. v. BosenIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kolar v. Cassia County IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API