Bream v. Benscoter
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an action to recover on an alleged guaranty in a promissory note. The district court held that the promissory note was ambiguous on its face regarding whether Ada Benscoter signed as a witness or a guarantor, and, after considering parol evidence, it found that she signed the note as a witness. It therefore entered a judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In April or May 1996, the plaintiff-appellant David Bream loaned Art King $50,000 to purchase and operate a business which became known as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Fox v. Mountain West Electric, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Petersen v. Franklin CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- J.R. Simplot Co. v. BosenIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Kolar v. Cassia County IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.