Legal Opinion
Hunt v. United States Air Force
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1994No. 93-CV-4629PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This action involves a pro se plaintiff who has sued the United States Air Force and various other federal agencies because he was “raped of [his] civil rights by the system.” Defendants now seek dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This motion is uncontested. 1 For the reasons set forth more fully below, defendants’ motion will be granted.
I. Standard
A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is the appropriate method in which to challenge the legal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gwendolyn Howze v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Samuel Weaver and Alice Weaver v. Marine BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Cahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Pittman v. Correctional Healthcare Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Marsh v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1995