Legal Opinion
Pittman v. Correctional Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-7016PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff, E. Carol Pittman, filed suit against her former employer, Correctional Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (“CHS”), alleging race, gender, and age discrimination. CHS has moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a cognizable claim. I will dismiss plaintiffs race and age discrimination claims, and one of two potential gender discrimination claims, without prejudice to replead. I conclude, however, that plaintiffs remaining gender ■discrimination claim is adequately pleaded; accordingly, I…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cortes v. University of Medicine & Dentistry of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Harley v. McCoachDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Stewart v. Weis Markets, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moore v. Grove North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Williams v. PerryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.