McDonald v. Pend Oreille Mines & Metals Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentBlake, J.
(dissenting)- — As against demurrer, a complaint is good if it states a cause of action on any theory. Isaacs v. Holland, 4 Wash. 54, 29 Pac. 976; Damon v. Leque, 14 Wash. 253, 44 Pac. 261; Peterson v. Pantheon Lumber Co., 62 Wash. 189, 113 Pac. 562; Harding v. Ostrander R. & Timber Co., 64 Wash. 224, 116 Pac. 635; White Bros. & Crum Co. v. Watson, 64 Wash. 666, 117 Pac. 497, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 254; Hughes v. McVay, 113 Wash. 333, 194 Pac. 565, 14 A. L. R. 681; Greenwood v. International Harvester Co., 122 Wash. 603, 211 Pac. 727; Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co., 188 Wash. 396, 63 P.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Isaacs v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- White Bros. v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Harding v. Ostrander Railway & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Cornwall v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.