Grimm v. Pallesen
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Foth, C.:
This is an action for the dissolution of an alleged partnership. The trial court found that no partnership ever existed and rendered judgment for the defendants. Plaintiff appeals, contending the evidence shows a partnership as a matter of law, or in the alternative that the trial court should at least have determined what the actual relationship of the parties was and rendered an accounting among them.
The trial court made extensive findings of fact, none of which are disputed on appeal. From them we find the following: Plaintiff Dwane Grimm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Potts v. LuxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Wade v. HornadaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Gilliland v. Kansas Soya Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Whan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Manhattan Bible College v. StriteskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lampe v. Williamson (In Re Lampe)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- McGuire v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Henrickson v. DrottsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Manley v. Wichita Business CollegeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- W-V Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Savings & Loan Ins.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.