Legal Opinion

Potts v. Lux

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1946No. 36,555PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This appeal involves the propriety of orders of the trial court in overruling several demurrers to a petition.

The action was commenced by Harry W. Potts against S. E. Lux, Jr., Ralph T. McKnaught and George Listz, for the purpose of obtaining an accounting and liquidation of the affairs of a business relationship characterized by plaintiff as a partnership. Shortly after its institution Potts died and the cause was revived in the name of Ila Belle Potts and John H. Potts, executors of the last will and testament of such decedent. Hereafter,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shoemake v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Livingston v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Wade v. HornadaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Crawford v. ForresterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Apple v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Stricklin v. Parsons Stockyard Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1982
  5. Beverly v. McCullickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API