State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of appellant, Robert Martin, because although he challenges the court of appeals’ April 2009 judgment dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus and declaratory relief, he did not file t a timely appeal from that judgment. S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(1). Neither his motion for reconsideration nor his Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment extended his time to appeal the judgment. Cotten v. Fitzpatrick, 98 Ohio St.3d 24, 2002-Ohio-7043, 780 N.E.2d 1019, ¶ 6; Key v. Mitchell (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 89, 90, 689 N.E.2d 548. Finally, a “Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Key v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Richard v. Cuyahoga Cty. Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cotten v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cotten v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by10 opinions
- GMAC Mortgage, L.L.C. v. HerringOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bank of New York v. BairdOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- UBS Real Estate Securities, Inc. v. TeagueOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State ex rel. Manuel v. StensonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Mancz v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.