State ex rel. Manuel v. Stenson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of appellant, Michael Manuel, because although he challenges the court of appeals’ November 10, 2009 judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus, he failed to file a timely appeal from that judgment. S.CtJPrac.R. 2.2(A)(1). His amended motion for rehearing, whether construed as a motion for reconsideration or a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, did not extend his time to appeal the judgment. State ex rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 124 Ohio St.3d 63, 2009-Ohio-6164, 918 N.E.2d 1005, ¶ 1. Manuel cannot use Civ.R. 60(B) as a substitute…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Albourque v. TerryOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Chardon Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Brock v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. McGrath v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Pesci v. GoodrichOhio Supreme Court · 2012