Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Manuel v. Stenson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2010No. 2010-0248PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of appellant, Michael Manuel, because although he challenges the court of appeals’ November 10, 2009 judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus, he failed to file a timely appeal from that judgment. S.CtJPrac.R. 2.2(A)(1). His amended motion for rehearing, whether construed as a motion for reconsideration or a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, did not extend his time to appeal the judgment. State ex rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 124 Ohio St.3d 63, 2009-Ohio-6164, 918 N.E.2d 1005, ¶ 1. Manuel cannot use Civ.R. 60(B) as a substitute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Albourque v. TerryOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Chardon Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Brock v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. McGrath v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Pesci v. GoodrichOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API