Legal Opinion
Cotten v. Fitzpatrick
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 2002No. 2002-1161PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Cotten v. Fitzpatrick, 98 Ohio St.3d 24,
2002-Ohio-7043.] COTTEN, APPELLANT, v. FITZPATRICK ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cotten v. Fitzpatrick, 98 Ohio St.3d 24,
2002-Ohio-7043.] Appeal — Court of appeals’ denial of “motion to certify the records” affirmed when motion is untimely. (No. 2002-1161 — Submitted November 13, 2002 — Decided December 20, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-788. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶1} On July 10, 2001, appellant, Prince Charles Cotten Sr., filed a complaint for writs of prohibition and procedendo in the Court of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Wilcox v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Phillips v. IrwinOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cotten v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009