Legal Opinion

Cotten v. Fitzpatrick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2002No. 2002-1161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On July 10, 2001, appellant, Prince Charles Cotten Sr., filed a complaint for writs of prohibition and procedendo in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Appellees, Richard E. Fitzpatrick and Sandra Crocket Mack, moved to dismiss. On August 28, 2001, a court of appeals magistrate issued a decision recommending that the court grant appellees’ motion and dismiss Cotten’s action because, among other reasons, Cotten had failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25.

{¶ 2} On January 17, 2002, the court of appeals overruled Cotten’s objections, adopted the magistrate’s decision, granted appellees’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Phillips v. IrwinOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Phillips v. IrwinOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cotten v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API