Legal Opinion
Davidson v. BARTHOLOME
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 12, 2006No. 92 CIV. 1864 CMPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MCMAHON, District Judge.
Introduction
Pro se plaintiff Ronald Davidson alleges that he denied needed pain medication by various Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) personnel in retaliation for two lawsuits he had previously brought against DOCS staff members. Davidson filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his alleged rights under the United States Constitution. This suit is one of the more than 150 lawsuits that Davidson has brought against DOCS and against DOCS employees during his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roseboro v. GillespieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Barrington v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. v. American Home Realty Network, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Aiello v. LamitieDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Booker v. GriffinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.