Legal Opinion

Field v. Tanner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1904No. 4414PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Teller County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

In this action to recover the possession of real property, the controversy is over the right of possession of a plot of mineral land in the Cripple Creek mining district. It lies within the outer boundaries of what appellant (plaintiff below) calls the Great Divide and Last Chance lode mining claims, to which he asserts ownership, and it is substantially the same territory embraced within the Ohio and Last Chance lodes claimed by appellees (defendants below), all of which are unpatented. Upon issues joined by the *280pleadings, the trial was to the court without a jury. Findings were in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  4. Weese v. BarkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  5. Armstrong v. LowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carlson v. McNeillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. Pine Grove Nevada Gold Mining Co. v. FreemanNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Carrey v. Secesh Dredging, Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Scoggin v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  5. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API