Legal Opinion

American Paper & Pulp Co., Inc. v. Maurice Denenberg, Individually and Trading as Denny Paper & Board Co., (Lansdowne Paper Mill, Inc.)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 21, 1956No. 11792_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case a buyer has obtained redress against a seller for an alleged breach of warranty of the quality of goods sold and delivered. The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found for plaintiff, American Paper & Pulp Co., against defendant, Denenberg, in the amount of $6,023.26, and made a like award to defendant against a third-party defendant who had manufactured and supplied the goods. However, the third-party defendant did not defend the action because prior to trial it had gone out of business and, apparently, was judgment-proof.

The goods were sold and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sloane v. ShifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Montgomery Foundry & Fittings Co. v. Hall Planetary Thread Milling Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Montgomery F. F. Co. v. hallp.T.M.M.co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Stanley Drug Co. v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. GNP Commodities, Inc. v. Walsh Heffernan Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Rubewa Products Co. v. Watson's Quality Turkey Products, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Carretta v. Bud Jack Corp.Nassau County District Court · 1970
  4. Gummed Tapes (PTY) Ltd. v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API