Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Wright
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1991No. WCB TP-88016; CA A51030; SC S37533PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether ORS ese^SO) 1 gave the Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board) the authority to determine whether SAIF Corporation (SAIF) was a “paying agency” within the meaning of that statute. We hold that the Board had the authority to make that determination. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, which held to the contrary.
Claimant suffered injuries in a two-car accident in 1984. He filed claims with four employers, contending that he was injured in the course and scope of employment and that at least one of the four was his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Schlecht v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Tracy v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Toole v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Weems v. American International Adjustment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Lee v. Oregon Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Longstreet v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.