Legal Opinion

Alsleben v. Oliver Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1959No. 37,530PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Questions arise as to: (1) Plaintiff’s right to cross-examine a defendant in default as an adverse witness under Rule 43.02 of Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) whether issue of waiver was within the pleadings; and (3) whether the evidence sustains a finding of waiver.

Defendant Oliver Corporation, herein called Oliver, is a manufacturer of tractors and other farm machinery. Defendant Ed Zarnke, doing business as Ed’s Implement Company, is a retail farm implement dealer at Glencoe, Minnesota. During and prior to 1954…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Bernick v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  4. Stephenson v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API