Lee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*552ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC
Before HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:
Appellees Charles and Kathleen Lee ask us to reexamine our decision in Lee v. United States, 967 F.2d 1569 (11th Cir.1992). Appellees’ petition for rehearing is denied and, no member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the suggestion of rehearing en banc is denied. However,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Violet M. Maahs, and Alfred J. Maahs, Her Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. TunnellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. TunnellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
- Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weekes-Walker v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993