Legal Opinion

Lee v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 12, 1992No. 91-7077PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, appellant Prudential Insurance Company (“Prudential”) appeals the entry of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Granting the plaintiffs’ *1570motion for summary judgment, the court concluded that plaintiffs-appellees Charles and Kathleen Lee were entitled to recover life insurance benefits from their son William Lee’s Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (“SGLI”) policy. According to federal law, Prudential must terminate an insured’s SGLI coverage “at the end of the thirty-first day of a continuous period of absence without leave.”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Violet M. Maahs, and Alfred J. Maahs, Her Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. TunnellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. TunnellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API