Legal Opinion
H-A
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3394PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3394 In re H-A-, Respondent Decided May 25, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Matter of Arthur,
20 I&N Dec. 475
(BIA 1992), is not inconsistent with the motions to reopen regulations at
8 C.F.R. §§ 3.2(c)(2) and 3.23(b)(4)(i) (effective July 1, 1996). Matter of Arthur, supra, reaffirmed. John H. Hagopian, Esquire, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, for respondent Before: Board En Banc: DUNNE, Vice Chairman; VACCA, HEILMAN, FILPPU, COLE, MATHON, JONES, GRANT, and SCIALABBA, Board Members. Dissenting Opinion:…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zafar v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Hyoun Kyung Lee v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- MARCAL NETOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
- Wen Yuan Chan v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- PEREZ VARGASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.