Legal Opinion

MARCAL NETO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2010No. ID 3669PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

25 I&N Dec. 169

(BIA 2010) Interim Decision #3669 Matter of Jose MARCAL NETO, et al., Respondents File A095 861 144 - Boston, Massachusetts File A095 861 145 File A095 861 146 Decided January 21, 2010 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Immigration Judges have authority to determine whether the validity of an alien’s approved employment-based visa petition is preserved under section 204(j) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154(j) (2006), after the alien’s change in jobs or employers. Matter of Perez Vargas,

23…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. HASHMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
  4. SIBRUNBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  5. Sang Chul Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. D-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
  2. KYONG HO SHIN v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Manguriu v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. KYONG HO SHIN v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Manguriu v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API