Legal Opinion
Zafar v. U.S. Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 27, 2005No. Nos. 04-16613, 04-16689 and 04-16750PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners are living in the United States on expired visas. Separate removal proceedings were initiated against all three in March and April, 2003. Each moved for continuances while awaiting labor certifications. They filed petitions seeking review of the Board of Immigration Affairs’ (BIA) summary affirmances of the immigration judges’ denials of their motions to continue their removal proceedings. The government contends that this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this case pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii). We hold that we have jurisdiction under this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Yu Zhao v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Mohammed Subhan v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Tefel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Mushtaq Ahmed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Rasaq Opyemi Sanusi v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hisham D. Abu-Khaliel v. Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- George Morgan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General, Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.