Legal Opinion
Hartstein v. Seidenbach's, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
The summons was served on defendant’s secretary who was here on. business of the corporation. Defendant occupies a retail store on Main street, Tulsa, Okla., where merchandise, principally ladies’ apparel, is sold at retail. Most of the purchases for the corporation, as shown by the affidavit of its president, are made from manufacturing concerns in New York city, and the orders for them are given on order blanks in accordance with the form annexed to the moving papers. Other than the purchase of goods to be sold at retail at Tulsa, no business of any kind is transacted in the State of New…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Belk v. Belk's Department Store of Columbia, S. C., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Samuel Hoffman, Inc. v. Mode Shoppe, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
- Distillers Factors Corp. v. Country Distillers Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Goldberger Construction Corp. v. Edmund J. Rappoli Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.