Legal Opinion
Mikes v. Strauss
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1995No. 92 Civ. 2754 (WCC)PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Patricia Mikes brings this action on behalf of the United States and herself against her former employers under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730, for alleged improper billing of medical procedures to the United States and for retaliatory discharge, and under New York Labor Law § 191, for unpaid wages for a two-week period of employment after her formal termination. In May, 1994 the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, in part for failing to state a claim in light of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States ex rel. Hopper v. AntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mary C. McKenzie v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., D/B/A South Central Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Mikes v. StrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.