Legal Opinion

Gage v. Pontiac, Oxford & Northern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Tuscola. (Beach, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to. recover damages from the defendant for negligently, maintaining an unsafe and dangerous approach to a cross-, ing over its railroad, constructed by the Pontiac, Oxford. & Port Austin Railroad Company, the defendant’s predecessor, across a public highway, and upon which approach the plaintiff sustained permanent injuries on the 23d day of February, 1892, by being thrown down the aforesaid embankment, together with the vehicle in which she was riding and the horse hitched thereto.

In the year 1881 the Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin Railroad Company…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Malloy v. Township of WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Houfe v. Town of FultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Hunt v. Town of PownalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
  5. Bleil v. Detroit Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. CharmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Brackins v. Olympia, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Johnson v. City of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Mills v. AB Dick CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API