Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Township of Walker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1889PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Walter S. Gee, deceased, *451against defendant township, to recover damages on account of the death of Walter S. Gee, which the plaintiff alleges was caused by the wrongful negligence of the defendant to keep in good repair, and in a condition reasonably safe and fit for travel, a certain highway in that township. Plaintiff on the trial in the court below, before a jury, had a verdict and judgment for $2,500. Defendant brings error.

Forty-nine errors are assigned. Ten of the assignments of error are based upon the ruling of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bassett v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Harris v. Township of ClintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. City of Freeport v. IsbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. City of Joliet v. VerleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bush v. Oscoda Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mullins v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Peters v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API