Legal Opinion

United States v. Desiderio

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 7, 1990No. ACM 28676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

Appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of use of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to airman basic. On appeal, he asserts two errors for our consideration. We find no prejudicial error.

I

First, appellant maintains that the service of charges upon him was ineffective because the service was not accomplished by trial counsel as required by R.C.M. 602. Appellant’s charge sheet (Department of Defense Form 458) reflects that his charges were served by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MoschellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. CorraineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. GruningerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. BoyleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. BobbyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. EverettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. WilliamsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API