Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyle

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 5, 1990No. ACM 28164PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Airman Boyle calls our attention to various errata in connection with his court-martial. We find no error prejudicial to his substantial rights and affirm.

I

He first notes that the Acting Staff Judge Advocate signed the referral block (Block 14), of the Charge Sheet, DD Form 458, as a judge advocate and not as an administrative officer acting at the direction of the convening authority. At the time he signed, the governing directive was a now-rescinded portion of Air Force Regulation 111-1, Military Justice Guide, paragraph 4-7(b)(5) (30 September 1988).* See also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. O'ConnorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. DesiderioU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. JacksonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. DelpU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. TaylorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API