State v. Lindsey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The defendants objected to the consolidation for trial of the various charges against both of them. The trial court may, in its discretion, consolidate for trial multiple charges against a defendant, or multiple defendants-, where the charges are of the same class and so connected in time or place that evidence at the trial of one of the indictments will be competent and admissible at the trial of the others. G.S. 15-152; State v. White, 256 N.C. 244, 123 S.E. 2d 483 (1962) ; State v. Garcia, 16 N.C. App. 344, 192 S.E. 2d 2 (1972). Here the State’s evidence tended to show that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. ElamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978