Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*622Opinion by
BELL, Chief Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751,1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Bonar Mayo Robertson, the respondent. The petition charged, as a result of a complaint by Bar Counsel, that the respondent violated Rules 1.1, Competence,2 1.3, Diligence,3 1.4, Communication,4 5.5, Unauthorized Practice of Law,5 and 8.4, Misconduct,6 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812.
*623We referred the case, pursuant to Rules 16-752(a),7 to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GisrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KreamerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCullochCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.