Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kreamer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 17, 2008No. Misc. Docket AG No. 18, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Respondent Barbara Osborn Kreamer on June 22, 2006. 2 The Petition alleged that Respondent violated multiple provisions of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct in her representation of six former clients: Patricia Goodwin, Courtney Anderson, David Ferrara, Gregory Dudok, Michael Boone, and Sarah Caldarelli. Bar Counsel alleged that Respondent violated most of the same rules in the six individual cases: Rule 1.1…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.