Legal Opinion
In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 20, 2011No. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*185 ORDER AND OPINION DENYING OBJECTION OF WTC CAPTIVE INSURANCE TO PAYING BONUSES PROVIDED BY THE SPA
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge:
On September 8, 2011, I issued an “abbreviated” but “final” order overruling the World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company’s objection to having to pay bonus payments under its settlement agreement. Summary Order Denying Objection to Bonus Payments, In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litig. (Doc. No. 2523) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2011). This Opinion, supplementing the findings and conclusions issued on September 8, 2011, provides the fuller explanation that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012