Legal Opinion

In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 11, 2012No. Nos. 21 MC 100 (AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION REQUIRING CONTINGENT PAYMENTS TO BE PAID TO SETTLING PLAINTIFFS

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge:

The issue on which I write relates to the City of New York’s obligation, through its insurer, the WTC Captive Insurance Company (“WTC Captive”), to pay Contingent Payments, a category of payments under the parties’ Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”). I hold that five million dollars was due and payable to the settling plaintiffs on January 20, 2012, and that the City and the WTC Captive breached the settlement agreement by failing and refusing to make the payment.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  4. In re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API