Legal Opinion

Fenner v. Sparks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1934No. 22883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C. J.

Plaintiffs in error were, at the time the controversy arose, copartners doing a' brokerage business with principal offices in New York City, N. Y., and New Orleans, La., and a branch office in Tulsa, Okla. The firm name was Fenner & Beane, and in that name it was a member of the Stock Exchange of New York City. Defendant in error was a customer of said firm dealing through their branch office in Tulsa. He was plaintiff in the trial court, and the parties are herein referred to as there.

Plaintiff placed an order with defendant on September 27, 1929, for the purchase of 100 shares of Montgomery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hilsmeyer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Knudson v. FenimoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. First Nat. Bank of Calumet v. RodgersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. F.H. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Hulen v. TruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Guaranty Life Insurance v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API