Legal Opinion

Atchison v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 2023No. 4:21-cv-00286Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COREY ATCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA; ROBERT ) JACKSON; GARY MEEK; KEN ) Case No. 21-cv-00286-TCK-SH MAKINSON; FRED PARKE; JACK ) PUTNAM; SCOTT ROGERS; MICHAEL ) EUBANKS; S.M. IRWIN; HAROLD ) “BEAR” WILSON; and UNKNOWN ) OFFICERS, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel documents that non-party Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office (“TCDA”) claims are privileged attorney work product or otherwise protected. The Court finds that a non-party may…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kevin Michael McCarthy Thomas William BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API