Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kevin Michael McCarthy Thomas William Blodgett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 3, 2003No. 02-55201PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Kevin McCarthy and Thomas Blodgett appeal the district court’s order granting the Application of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) seeking enforcement of a Commission order. The Commission affirmed a disciplinary decision of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”), fining McCarthy and Blodgett $48,892.37 and $50,453.33 respectively. Appellants appeal on the grounds that (1) the Commission does not possess standing to file this Application; (2) the district court erred in utilizing summary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Ja'vonce Warre, on Behalf of E.T. Iv, a Minor Child v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. Arthur Andersen LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ali Padash v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.